Is Judge Gull In The Delphi Case Incapable Of Being Impartial?

In the complex and emotionally charged Delphi murder case, is justice being clouded by human imperfections within the judicial system? This question has emerged as a central theme in the ongoing saga involving Richard Allen, the man accused of the tragic murders of two young girls. Psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott recently joined Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers" to explore the psychological dynamics at play, particularly focusing on Judge Gull’s handling of the case.

As Scott points out, every judge, being human, carries their own set of unconscious prejudices. This reality is starkly evident in Judge Gull's actions throughout the Delphi case. "It does seem like in this case, it's particularly evident... she's got her own preconceived ideas and doesn't like this. Doesn't like the attorneys clearly and probably has prejudices against the defendant too," Scott observed.

The conversation highlighted the significant role of a judge's personality in shaping their rulings, a factor that can lead to dramatically different outcomes in the courtroom. Scott noted, “You see such dramatically different types of people who become judges... and some do seem to go the extra mile to be polite, to be fair. But others, their own personality is leaking through.”

The discussion then shifted to the broader implications of these human elements within our justice system. Brueski and Scott delved into whether there should be more stringent oversight in selecting judges, considering the immense power they wield in shaping lives and administering justice. Scott suggested that psychological evaluations might be a way to ensure that individuals with significant biases or personality issues do not end up in positions of judicial authority.

The pair also touched upon the curious phenomenon observed in studies where judges’ rulings were found to be influenced by factors as mundane as the time of day and their level of hunger. This finding underscores the deeply human aspect of judicial decision-making and its potential impact on justice delivery.

The ongoing case of Richard Allen, with its twists and turns largely influenced by Judge Gull's decisions, brings to light the critical question of fairness in the legal process. Can a system so reliant on human judgment truly deliver justice that is blind and impartial? And if not, what safeguards can be implemented to protect the integrity of the judicial process?

As the Delphi case continues to unfold, the conversation with Scott has opened up a Pandora's box of questions regarding the subjective nature of justice and the human fallibility within our legal systems. It remains to be seen how these issues will play out in the pursuit of justice for the tragic loss of two young lives in Delphi.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Release date

Lydbog: 31. januar 2024