app_store_button

google_play_button

DK - Details page - Device banner - 894x1036

Lyt når som helst, hvor som helst 

The New Yorker

Join The New Yorker’s writers and editors for reporting, insight, and analysis of the most pressing political issues of our time. On Mondays, David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, presents conversations and feature stories about current events. On Wednesdays, the senior editor Tyler Foggatt goes deep on a consequential political story via far-reaching interviews with staff writers and outside experts. And, on Fridays, the staff writers Susan B. Glasser, Jane Mayer, and Evan Osnos discuss the latest developments in Washington and beyond, offering an encompassing understanding of this moment in American politics.

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

The Washington Roundtable’s Jane Mayer interviews Andrew Weissmann, a former prosecutor for the Department of Justice who served as a lead member of the Mueller investigation, about what meaningful legal accountability in the Trump Administration looks like. He points to a fix that would raise the bar for federal grand-jury indictments, and explains why he believes that Donald Trump’s disputed I.R.S. settlement may not survive legal scrutiny. He also makes the case, drawn from his new book, “Liar’s Kingdom: How to Stop Trump’s Deceit and Save America,” for treating political lying itself as a problem that the law can address. “We have to be thinking about big, bold ideas,” Weissmann says.

This week’s reading:

 “The Future, Made in China,” by Evan Osnos

 “How Roy Cohn Taught Donald Trump Everything,” by Kai Bird and Susan Goldmark

 “Why Donald Trump Talks So Much About Foreign Election Interference,” by David D. Kirkpatrick

 “The Electability of Abdul El-Sayed,” by Jason Zengerle

Tune in to The Political Scene ⁠wherever you get your podcasts⁠.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Andrew Weissmann Thinks Donald Trump Can Be Held to Account

Michigan’s Senate seat is a must-win for Democrats hoping to take control of the Senate in 2026. The midterms are reflecting a surge of energy behind left-leaning Democratic candidates—sometimes known as the Mamdani effect—challenging their party’s establishment and its tarnished image. Abdul El-Sayed, a former health official, firmly supports Medicare for All and the abolition of ICE. He’s ahead of his moderate Democratic rival, Haley Stevens, in most polls. But that has some Democrats worried that El-Sayed is too radical to win the general election in a state that narrowly voted for Trump in 2024. El-Sayed talks with David Remnick about being “radicalized in medical school,” the trap of expressing righteous anger as an Arab candidate, how Robert F. Kennedy’s anti-science views have taken such a hold on the public, and why AIPAC and other lobbying groups have spent sixty million dollars opposing him in this election. 

Further reading and listening: 

 “Michigan Is the Next Big Test for the Democratic Party,” by Jason Zengerle

 “Can the Democrats Get It Together?,” by Amy Davidson Sorkin

 “Governor Gretchen Whitmer on COVID-19, Trump, and the Accusations Against Joe Biden,” an episode of The New Yorker Radio Hour

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed Is “Not a Burn-It-Down Kind” of Candidate

The Washington Roundtable reflects on the stories they’ve been following this summer, touching on the “power mourners” at Lindsey Graham’s funeral, Anthony Fauci’s diaries and Senate hearing, and China’s usurping of the U.S. in global power. Plus, the hosts share what books they’re reading. 

This week’s reading:

 “The Outlandish Case Against James Comey,” by Ruth Marcus

 “Which Way Should the Democratic Party Go Now?,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells

 “Will Left-Wing Democrats Reinvent the Party or Hurt Its Chances in November?,” by Isaac Chotiner

 “How Donald Trump Silenced the Voice of America,” by Marc Fisher

Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Obsession-Worthy Stories: A Washington Summer Roundtable

The New Yorker contributor Mike Spies joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss the story of a woman who lost two partners to suicide by firearm and then spent years in a legal battle with the National Rifle Association over her late partner’s retirement savings. They talk about the role that gun ownership and decades of messaging from the N.R.A. played in her second partner’s descent into paranoia, extremism, and abuse. They also explore the link between firearm access and suicide, how gun-rights organizations have sought to cast doubt on research connecting the two, and the current state of the debate over gun rights and gun safety.

This episode mentions suicide and suicidal thoughts. If you are having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 or chat at 988Lifeline.org. 

This week’s reading:

 “A Woman Lost Two Partners to Guns—Then the N.R.A. Came to Collect,” by Mike Spies

 “Trump’s Isolationism Is Losing the Great E.V. Race,” by Bill McKibben

 “The Department of Labored Content,” by Brady Brickner-Wood

 “How Netanyahu’s Top General Became His Strongest Challenger,” by David Remnick

 “Which Way Should the Democratic Party Go Now?,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells

Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Woman Who Took On the N.R.A. After Two Gun Suicides

In 2025, as ICE was struggling to meet an impossible goal of three thousand immigration arrests per day, the agency took an unprecedented step: picking people up when they arrived at immigration court. These were immigrants seeking legal status through appropriate channels. The staff writer Jonathan Blitzer, who has been reporting on immigration for over a decade, tells the story of one man detained this way, a Guinean refugee who was seeking asylum after a severe beating and death threats by his government. His first name is Alsainy, and his story exemplifies the ways that the Trump Administration is sabotaging the system of legal immigration. 

 Though President Donald Trump came back to the White House with broad support for his border policies, his Administration’s immigration crackdown has been broadly unpopular. The staff writer Jonathan Blitzer spoke with two representatives in Congress about the blowback: Jason Crow, of Colorado, and María Salazar, of Florida. Crow is one of the Democratic Party’s recruitment co-chairs for the midterm elections, a role that entails helping candidates figure out what to say about issues that have proved controversial for their party. Salazar, whose district includes much of Miami, is a diehard Trump supporter, but many of her Republican constituents are outraged at how ICE has been operating, and she remains hopeful that the Administration might make a sharp turn. “Mr. President, you’ve got to change the way when it comes to immigration,” she’d like to tell him. “Otherwise, we’re not going to have a Republican Party.”

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

One Refugee’s Journey Through ICE Detention

The Washington Roundtable is joined by Carl Hulse, the New York Times’ chief Washington correspondent, to discuss Congress’s dwindling role in the American political system. Why are Congress members passing fewer bills than their predecessors? Why can the institution no longer complete basic tasks of governing, such as passing a budget on time? Are representatives more interested in being social-media stars than crafting legislation? The panel analyzes why Congress has increasingly surrendered its power to the President, in areas as diverse as tariffs and the war in Iran. “Once you give up power, you never get it back in Washington,” Hulse says.

This week’s reading:

 “The White House Press Corps in the Second Trump Era,” by Katy Waldman

 “The Complications of Graham Platner’s Veteran Identity,” by Jasper Craven

 “Maine’s Mad Scramble to Replace Graham Platner,” by Jason Zengerle

 “Trump’s War on Journalists,” by Ruth Marcus

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Congress Used to Work. What Happened?

The New Yorker staff writer David D. Kirkpatrick joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss the Biden Administration’s failure to restrain Israel during its military campaign in Gaza. They talk about what Kirkpatrick has learned from former senior members of Biden’s national-security team—some of whom spoke on the record about key decisions during the conflict for the first time—and how previously undisclosed documents and revelations point to the Administration’s failure to rein in the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and to reduce Palestinian civilian casualties. They also explore why the former officials are now speaking candidly about their missteps, and whether the Administration’s approach to Israel helped shape the conditions that led to the current war with Iran.

This week’s reading:

 “How Biden Enabled Israel’s Aggression Toward Gaza—and Iran,” by David D. Kirkpatrick

 “María Corina Machado’s Opposition in Exile,” by Stephania Taladrid

 “Donald Trump’s Election-Fraud Bait and Switch,” by Ruth Marcus 

 “Can Andy Burnham’s Manchesterism Save the U.K.’s Center Left?,” by John Cassidy 

 “Donald Trump’s Ad-Lib Strategy on Iran,” by Robin Wright 

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What Biden Officials Wish They Had Done Differently in Gaza

Rahm Emanuel is a Democratic Party elder, having served in the Clinton and Obama Administrations and as mayor of his native Chicago for two terms. He’s a centrist known for valuing political wins over ideology, making it especially notable that Emanuel recently gave a blistering speech in Israel, calling the country’s path “not sustainable politically.” He says that the United States should no longer grant Israel unconditional military support, and explains his own plan for a diplomatic Middle East solution that he calls a “twenty-three-state solution.” Emanuel, who hasn’t formally announced but appears to have embarked on a campaign for the 2028 Presidency, defends his position on trans rights, which has angered many on the left, and his contention that the Democratic Party is overly concerned with identity politics. 

Further reading: 

 “Trump and Rahm Emanuel Both Love a Fight, Especially Against Each Other,” by Susan B. Glasser.

 “Rahm Emanuel’s Lessons for Hilary Clinton,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells

 “The Sudden but Well-Deserved Fall of Rahm Emanuel,” by Rick Perlstein

 “Emanuel in Full,” by Lizzie Widdicombe

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Rahm Emanuel Says Israel’s Path Is “Not Sustainable Politically”

The Washington Roundtable discusses Donald Trump’s latest attempt to relitigate the 2020 election. In a prime-time speech on Thursday, he argued that newly declassified documents suggest that U.S. election systems are vulnerable. “He described interference in the election in alarming terms,” the staff writer Jane Mayer says. “But there was absolutely no final bottom line where he was able to prove that a single vote was stolen.” The panel explores how false claims about past elections could serve as a pretext for federal intervention in the midterms, especially if issues like the war with Iran continue to depress the President’s approval rating and hurt Republicans’ chances.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Donald Trump Can’t Quit the 2020 Election

Dave Regan, the president of the prominent California union S.E.I.U.-United Healthcare Workers West, joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss Proposition 40, a ballot measure that would impose a one-time, five-per-cent tax on the net worth of the state’s billionaires. They talk about the origins of the initiative—which came in response to cuts to health care from Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act—and how the political fight over the proposition fits into the broader wave of populist politics and a growing appetite for challenging the wealthy. They also explore the opposition from a handful of wealthy Silicon Valley figures, who have spent more than a hundred million dollars to defeat the measure. California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, and some health-care organizations have expressed concerns that the tax could drive the ultra-wealthy out of the state and would fail to provide a long-term funding solution for public services. Whether the ballot measure fails or passes, does the fight over Proposition 40 signal a broader shift toward more ambitious efforts to tax the wealthy?

This week’s reading:

 “How Ukraine Brought the War to Russia,” by Joshua Yaffa

 “Inside ICE’s Largest Detention Center,” by Jonathan Blitzer

 “Democratic Schadenfreude and the Latino Vote,” by Jack Herrera

 “The Remaking of Lindsey Graham,” by Ruth Marcus

 “An O.M.B. Plan to Defund Science—and Anything Trump Doesn’t Like,” by Elizabeth Kolbert

The Political Scene draws on the reporting and analysis found in The New Yorker for lively conversations about the big questions in American politics. Join the magazine’s writers and editors as they put into context the latest news—about elections, the economy, the White House, the Supreme Court, and much more. New episodes are available three times a week. 
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Can California Actually Make Billionaires Pay?

The New Yorker contributing writer Ruth Marcus joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss the Supreme Court’s now concluded term and what some of the recent decisions indicate about the bench’s willingness to check President Trump’s use of executive power. They talk about the Court’s rulings on immigration, transgender athletes, the President’s authority to fire heads of independent federal agencies, and what various opinions reveal about the Republican-appointed justices’ tendency to side with the Trump Administration. They also explore the Court’s rejection of Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship, and whether the ruling should be seen as a reassuring defense of settled law or a warning that even long-established constitutional protections may be more vulnerable than they once appeared.

This week’s reading:

 “The Supreme Court Enables Trump’s Cruel Immigration Agenda,” by Ruth Marcus

 “The Supreme Court’s Check on Trump’s Power Was Too Close for Comfort,” by Ruth Marcus

 “How Political Is This Supreme Court?,” by Isaac Chotiner

 “Behind the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Transgender Athletes,” by Jeannie Suk Gersen

 “The Supreme Court Upheld Birthright Citizenship—but the Fight May Not Be Over,” by Amy Davidson Sorkin

Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

How the Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Is Reshaping Executive Power

Lyt når som helst, hvor som helst

Other podcasts you might like ...