Unprincipled and Inconsistent Voting Rights Shenanigans
- Forfatter
- Afsnit
- 196
- Udgivet
- 19. sep. 2022
- Forlag
- 0 Anmeldelser
- 0
- Afsnit
- 196 of 438
- Længde
- 52M
- Sprog
- Engelsk
- Format
- Kategori
- Fakta
Leah talks with Wilfred Codrington III about his article, "Purcell in Pandemic," which appeared in the NYU Law Review. The Purcell Principle comes from a 2006 Supreme Court case about what makes an appropriate timeline for changing election laws. The principle wasn't clear to begin with, and has only gotten more confusing in litigation surrounding the 2020 election. Will we see it continue to play out in this year's midterms?
Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE – The Bad Decisions Tour 2025!
• 3/6/26 – San Francisco
• 3/7/26 – Los Angeles
Learn more: http://crooked.com/events
Order your copy of Leah's book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes
Follow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky
Other podcasts you might like ...
- M’usa, con l’apostrofo. Le donne di PicassoLetizia Bravi
- FC PopCornFilm Companion
- Do I Like It?The Quint
- The Big StoryThe Quint
- DiskoteksbrandenAntonio de la Cruz
- Dragon gateEdith Söderström
- En amerikansk epidemiPatrick Stanelius
- En värld i brand: Andra världskriget och sanningenAnton Vretander
- FamiljenFrida Anund
- Hagen-fallet: Spårlöst försvunnenAntonio de la Cruz
- M’usa, con l’apostrofo. Le donne di PicassoLetizia Bravi
- FC PopCornFilm Companion
- Do I Like It?The Quint
- The Big StoryThe Quint
- DiskoteksbrandenAntonio de la Cruz
- Dragon gateEdith Söderström
- En amerikansk epidemiPatrick Stanelius
- En värld i brand: Andra världskriget och sanningenAnton Vretander
- FamiljenFrida Anund
- Hagen-fallet: Spårlöst försvunnenAntonio de la Cruz
