Read the full transcript here.
How can we encourage people to increase their critical thinking and reliance on evidence in the current information climate? What types of evidence "count" as valid, useful, or demonstrative? And what are the relative strengths and weaknesses of those types? Could someone reasonably come to believe just about anything, provided that they live through very specific sets of experiences? What does it mean to have a "naturalistic" epistemology? How does a philosophical disorder differ from a moral failure? Historically speaking, where does morality come from? Is moral circle expansion always good or praiseworthy? What sorts of entities deserve moral consideration?
Jamie Woodhouse works on the Sentientism worldview ("evidence, reason, and compassion for all sentient beings") — refining the philosophy, raising awareness of the idea, and building communities and movements around it. After a quarter century in the corporate world he is a now an independent consultant, coach, and volunteer. You can follow Jamie on Twitter at @JamieWoodhouse or email him at hello@sentientism.info.
Here are a few more links related to Sentientism:
Sentientism YouTube channelSentientism podcastSentientism websiteSentientism Facebook groupAll other places to find Sentientism (including Twitter, Reddit, Discord, and many others) Staff
Spencer Greenberg • — Host / Director Josh Castle • — Producer Ryan Kessler • — Audio Engineer Uri Bram • — Factotum Janaisa Baril • — Transcriptionist
Music
Broke for FreeJosh WoodwardLee RosevereQuiet Music for Tiny Robotswowamusiczapsplat.com Affiliates
Clearer ThinkingGuidedTrackMind EasePositlyUpLift[Read more]
Nyd den ubegrænsede adgang til tusindvis af spændende e- og lydbøger - helt gratis
Dansk
Danmark